Robert Whale can be reached at

Robert Whale can be reached at

Here's what communist and totalitarian trials really look like | Whale's Tales

In the 1968 film “Oliver!,” the murderous Bill Sykes’ doomed lover, Nancy, leads pub revelers in a round of “Oom Pah Pah,” a rolicking repetition of three nonsense syllables into which people read whatever meanings they choose.

“If you’ve got the patience, your own imagination will tell you exactly what you want to hear,” the song goes.

Hearing the song again got me thinking about words and phrases we Americans interpret to suit our own ends.

Take the phrase “judicial activism.” Purportedly, it defines judicial activists as judges who abandon their responsibility to interpret the Constitution and instead decide cases to advance their preferred policies.

All well and good.

But in practice, the true meaning depends upon one’s ideology. A more accurate definition would be: “Whatever jurists with whom I disagree politically do when they’re on the bench.” Of course, when judges I agree with do the same thing, it’s not judicial activism, not at all — it’s “originalism.”

Or take the phrase, “government overreach.” As I’ve come to realize, Democrats and Republicans both “overreach” into the lives of Americans, as any non-biased observer can plainly see. But of course, when “they” do it, it’s overeach, and when “we” do it, it’s nothing of the sort.

Likewise, we Americans like to declare our legal system, flawed as it has shown itself to be at times, as “the best in the world.” Apparently, however, it’s only “best” when it comes down hard on human beings we despise. But when our guy is in the dock, the system suddenly becomes “communist” or “totalitarian.”

That’s what many supporters of former President Donald Trump are saying about his recent indictment by a New York grand jury on charges of falsifying records.

But think about the words “communist,” and “totalitarian” for a moment. Now ask yourself, what would happen to former President Donald Trump if he were in the clutches of a real “communist” or “totalitarian” system?

First, we’d have to jettison any mention of “due process” or “indictment” by a grand jury composed of one’s fellow citizens. In Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union and Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany, there was no due process, and there were no grand juries.

Don’t take my word for it — the historical record is clear.

Consider how Judge Roland Freisler, the Nazi ideologue and fanatic, conducted the so-called “People’s Court,” whose “trials,” filmed for the “enlightenment of the German masses,” we can now watch on the internet.

Among the examples of the “Freisler method” during the Third Reich, I’ll limit myself to the proceedings on Aug. 7 and Aug. 8, 1944, after the Gestapo arrested some of the people involved in the failed assassination of Hitler one month prior and hauled them before Freisler.

We see Freisler alternating between coolly questioning the defendants, then suddenly lashing out with humiliating, soul- crushing, verbal tirades. At one moment, Freisler screams at Field Marshal Erwin von Witzleben, as he tries to hold up the old, oversized, beltless pants the court has provided him for his appearance: “You dirty old man, why do you keep fiddling with your trousers?!”

And consider Freisler’s over-the-top theatrics during the “trial” of defendant Ulrich-Wilhelm Graf Schwerin von Schwanenfeld. There’s the judge, drowning out Schwerin’s testimony about his concern over the German Army’s “numerous murders in Poland” by roaring at him: “You really are a lousy piece of trash!”

Many of the plotters were sentenced to slow, agonizing deaths, twisting on piano wire, which Hitler ordered filmed to sate his lust for revenge. Some of the sentences were carried out within two hours of the verdict.

Stalin’s pleasure was to draw up a list of people he wanted executed. And if the list was a few names short, no problem — he’d order his police services to find other names to flesh it out. Didn’t matter who they were, Stalin said, put them on the list.

No trial, no jury, no possiblity of defending oneself, only death.

Yet, there are American citizens hotly comparing our legal system to the law under those monstrous regimes.

If Trump does go to trial, he will be found guilty or not guilty in an American courtroom that recognizes due process of the law. But if he’d been a defendant under the other regimes I mentioned above, there would have been no due process, just a wire noose, or a bullet to the head.

On the flip side, however, as a prominent person of wealth and power in a despotic system, the former president likely would not have had to answer for anything.

That’s authoritarian justice.

So please, spare us any more BS about “communist show trials.” To say so speaks of ignorance. It speaks of “Oom Pah Pah.”

Robert Whale can be reached at

Talk to us

Please share your story tips by emailing

To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) Please keep letters to 300 words or less.

More in Opinion

Robert Whale can be reached at
In search of fairness, morals and good sportsmanship | Whale's Tales

Ah, the Golden Rule. We all know it: do unto others as… Continue reading

Robert Whale can be reached at
The key thing is what we do with our imperfections | Whale's Tales

I have said and done many things of which I am not proud. That is, I am no golden bird cheeping about human frailties from some high branch of superhuman understanding.

Robert Whale can be reached at
Grappling with the finality of an oncologist's statement | Whale's Tales

Perhaps my brain injected a bit of humor to cover the shock. But I felt the gut punch.

Cartoon by Frank Shiers
Legislature back in session next week | Cartoon

State lawmakers return Jan. 8 to Olympia.

Cartoon by Frank Shiers
Santa doesn't drive a Kia | Cartoon

Cartoon by Frank Shiers.

Cartoon by Frank Shiers
Salute to veterans | Cartoon by Frank Shiers

On Veterans Day, honor those who served your country.

File photo
Why you should vote in the upcoming election | Guest column

When I ask my students when the next election is, frequently they will say “November 2024” or whichever presidential year is coming up next.

Robert Whale can be reached at
Here's a column for anyone who loves their dog | Whale's Tales

It is plain to me in looking at dogs small and large that a decent share of them are exemplars of love on Earth, innocents who love unconditionally and love their chow.

Robert Whale can be reached at
Please protect your children from BS spreaders | Whale's Tales

Among the most useful things I studied in college were debate, and… Continue reading

It's time to change Kent's City Council elections to districts | Guest column

If you were asked who your city councilmembers are, would you have an answer?

Don C. Brunell is a business analyst, writer and columnist. He is a former president of the Association of Washington Business, the state’s oldest and largest business organization, and lives in Vancouver. Contact
Dear government: Hold your horses when regulating trucks | Brunell

Next to gasoline and diesel, natural gas also has the greatest number of refueling stations.